邢唷��>� ��欹�€ ��,�bjbj肴肴 7墷墷�%�� 8/��D`R��"��胈臺臺臺臺臺臺$朾�8e�開��開��㥮h%h%h%��胈h%�胈h%h%�逴DgS�� 閶虨��#Q&痏`0D`IQ萫�"~萫LgS萫�gSH��h%��開開8$0��D`��萫�� : WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 29 April 2008 3:30 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S SENATORS PRESENT: L. Baker-Sperry, C. Blackinton, V. Boynton, L. Brice, K. Clontz, J. Clough, D. Connelly, K. Daytner, J. Deitz, S. Edsall, K. Hall, R. Hironimus-Wendt, V. Jelatis, M. Maskarinec, L. Meloy, N. Miczo, D. Mummert, R. Orwig, C. Pynes, S. Rock, M. Siddiqi, B. Sonnek Ex-officio: Jack Thomas, Provost; T. Kaul, Parliamentarian SENATORS ABSENT: None GUESTS: Barb Baily, Judi Dallinger, Dennis DeVolder, Richard Filipink, Diane Hamilton-Hancock, Phyllida Kornoski, Fred May, Jennifer McNabb, Moises Molina, Lea Monahan, Michael Murray, Kathy Neumann, Tere North, Nancy Parsons, Polly Radosh, Jim Schmidt, Bill Thompson, Charles Wright I. Consideration of Minutes � 15 April 2008 APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED II. Announcements A. Resolution to Honor Outgoing Faculty Senate Chair Steve Rock Vice Chair Connelly read a Resolution in Recognition of Exceptional Service by Dr. Steven M. Rock, Chair of the Faculty Senate, 2005-2008: RATIONALEWHEREAS, Dr. Rock was voted Faculty Senate Chair for Academic Years 2005/2006 through 2007/2008; and WHEREAS, he leaves this office with the distinction of having served the longest continuous term in the history of the 91仓库 Faculty Senate; andWHEREAS, he has provided exemplary leadership and service to the Faculty Senate; andWHEREAS, he has performed in an outstanding manner as spokesperson for the Faculty Senate; andWHEREAS, his commitment to the ideals of faculty governance will serve as a long-lasting model for future Senators;RESOLUTIONNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Faculty Senate of 91仓库 hereby officially recognizes Dr. Steven M. Rock for his distinguished service to the Faculty Senate and to 91仓库.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT this Resolution be permanently recorded in, and distributed via the Minutes of the 91仓库 Faculty Senate. B. Approvals from the Provost 1. Requests for New Courses a. ENGR 251, Strength of Materials, 3 s.h. b. ENGR 311, Fluid Dynamics, 3 s.h. c. ENGR 330, Engineering Economics, 3 s.h. d. ENGR 331, Engineering Project Planning, 3 s.h. e. ENGR 471, Microelectronic Circuits, 3 s.h. f. ENGR 478, Industrial Controls, 3 s.h. g. ENGR 499, Senior Design, 2 s.h. (repeatable to 4 s.h.) h. MUS 499, Vocal Literature and Pedagogy, 3 s.h. i. THEA 499, BFA Senior Project, 3 s.h. j. UNIV 099, BOT/BA Prior Learning Portfolio Tutorial, 0 s.h. 2. Request for Change in Minor a. Marketing 3. Requests for Changes in Majors a. Board of Trustees Bachelor of Arts Degree Program b. Musical Theatre 4. Request for New Major a. Engineering C. Provost抯 Report Provost Thomas thanked senators for their hard work and dedication toward making 91仓库 a great place to be. He said he appreciates hearing senators� concerns as Western is an institution that believes in shared governance and open communication. Provost Thomas told senators he came up through the faculty ranks before attaining his current position, including at one point serving as faculty senate chair, so he appreciates the differences and comments that are expressed at Senate meetings. The Provost also thanked Chairperson Rock for his guidance and leadership and for helping with Provost Thomas抯 transition to Western. The Provost related that at his previous institutions, administrators were not expected to participate at senate meetings, so he has appreciated senators� patience as he adjusts to his role as an ex-officio and participating member of Faculty Senate. He assured senators that issues and concerns brought up at Senate meetings will be brought to the forefront in administrative discussions. The academic honors convocation will be held at 2:00 p.m. on May 9, followed by the graduate hooding ceremony and commencement at 5:30 p.m. Undergraduate commencement on the Macomb campus will be held on May 10, with ceremonies at 9:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. Undergraduate and graduate commencement ceremonies will be held on the Quad Cities campus at 3:00 p.m. on May 11. A schedule of events is available on the Provost抯 homepage. Provost Thomas announced that four faculty have been chosen to represent Faculty Senate on the new Provost抯 Advisory Committee: Senators Baker-Sperry, Blackinton, and Mummert, and Bill Thompson of University Libraries. A complete list of Advisory Committee members will be sent to Faculty Senate and others once the remaining membership is determined. The Committee will begin meeting in fall semester. Presentation of consolidated annual reports begins tomorrow, with the Student Affairs presentation at 8:00 a.m. followed by that of Academic Affairs at 9:30 a.m. in the Capitol Rooms. The presentations will also be broadcast to the Quad Cities campus. Provost Thomas told senators he asked Assessment Coordinator Tere North, who administers WIU抯 surveys, to briefly address Faculty Senate about that process: Dr. North explained that when an individual, group, or organization wants to distribute an online survey, they must complete the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process to ensure that both the research and the survey meet the federal and University requirements governing human subjects research. IRB, administered through the Office of Sponsored Projects, verifies that the survey is valid and may require the person submitting it to complete a two-hour online training program that discusses how the information obtained can be utilized. Dr. North told senators she has completed 160 hours of survey training. Those wishing to distribute surveys online must also complete a batch email request, which must be signed by the appropriate vice president and by the Vice President for Administrative Services before email addresses are downloaded to Dr. North. Dr. North explained the titles of particular surveys are generally quite clear, and any surveys can be deleted as desired. She said that use of a spam filter to prevent surveys from entering faculty mailboxes is not desirable because of the possibility of blocking information important for the faculty member to receive. Dr. North explained the difference between the terms 揳nonymous� and 揷onfidential.� She explained that 揳nonymous� indicates that a person can vote as many times as he or she wishes. 揅onfidential� means that persons must sign in prior to voting: a record is kept of whether each person voted or not, although not necessarily how each person voted. Dr. North told senators that Western抯 surveys are confidential, not anonymous. One exception to this was the recent survey on athletic team names, which allowed persons to vote as many times as they wished. Dr. North stated that, in theory, she could go back and determine how an individual voted. Dr. North asserted that with 50,000 survey responses received per year, she does not have the time or the desire to do this. When survey data is provided to a requesting individual, Dr. North explained that the data is 搒crubbed� of anything that would identify respondents. Senator Sonnek appreciates that the surveys faculty are asked to fill out are easy and clear. Dr. North told senators that some surveys submitted to her are not well done, but she cannot tell survey preparers not to ask certain questions. She has noticed that the easier surveys garner the most responses, and those with an open format that allow respondents to express their opinions work best. Senator Blackinton wondered if her responses were being recognized since she uses a Macintosh computer. Dr. North responded that faculty can ask her to check whether their survey responses are being received. Once surveys are completed, if faculty check the 揻inish� box, they should be directed to an exit screen, typically HYPERLINK "http://www.wiu.edu" www.wiu.edu. Dr. North has experienced some difficulties with certain surveys operating correctly on Safari and Explorer browsers, but has had no problems with Firefox. The question was raised whether Dr. North ever receives requests to identify faculty who have and have not responded to surveys. Dr. North responded that in the case of the deans� review, she did send out information regarding who had not yet responded so that deans could personally contact those individuals. But she said deans had no way of knowing who ultimately responded by survey抯 end since to divulge that information would be a violation of federal guidelines. Dr. North told senators that IRB is considering stiffening its requirements for survey distribution after a recent survey to many employees was generated using email addresses purchased from a company in India. She said Sponsored Projects is considering determining how samples are being collected prior to approval of surveys. Parliamentarian Kaul asserted that faculty do not respond to some important surveys because of the number of surveys that they receive. Dr. North disagreed that the survey response rate is declining, stating that responses are increasing as faculty see that their voice is counted in online surveys. She reiterated that the subject line of emailed surveys always clearly states its objective. D. Student Government Association Report (Phyllida Kornoski, SGA representative to Faculty Senate) Ms. Kornoski said SGA has not had a quorum for recent meetings so these have been informal sessions with more serious discussions anticipated for the beginning of fall semester. E. Other Announcements 1. Revision to Guidelines for Designation as a School Guidelines approved by Faculty Senate and President Goldfarb in December will be revised to eliminate a requirement that the Provost report endorsement of a request for designation as a school to the Administrative Affairs and Budget Committee prior to forwarding the request to the President for approval. 2. Today is the deadline for completed petitions for three fall vacancies on the University Personnel Committee. the College of Education and Human Services, the College of Fine Arts and Communication, and for University Libraries/Counseling Center/Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs. All are three-year positions. Only tenured, full professors may serve on UPC. Motion: To reorder the agenda to consider Old Business A. and B. next (Hironimus-Wendt/ Blackinton) MOTION APPROVED 17 YES � 0 NO � 3 AB IV. Old Business (Reordered) A. Proposed Resolution Regarding Coverage of Dependents Under the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy Whereas 91仓库has adopted the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy with the intent of providing all of its faculty and staff with complete access to employment benefits, including importantly, access to health insurance; and Whereas the Faculty has recently learned that dependent children of Domestic Partnerships are not covered under this current health insurance policy; Therefore, be it resolved that the 91仓库Faculty Senate supports any and all efforts by 91仓库Administration to fully extend health benefit coverage under the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy to include the dependents of dependents. RESOLUTION APPROVED 20 YES � 1 NO � 1 AB B. Proposed Resolution for Establishment of 91仓库Lactation Rooms Whereas, 820 Illinois Compiled Statutes 260/15 (Nursing Mothers in the Workplace Act) states: Sec. 15. Private place for nursing mothers. An employer shall make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location, in close proximity to the work area, other than a toilet stall, where an employee described in Section 10 can express her milk in privacy. (Source: P.A. 92-68, eff. 7-12-01.); and Whereas, the 91仓库Faculty Senate is on record as supporting the creation of such rooms dedicated for nursing mothers to express breast milk; and Whereas, providing a safe, private place to express breast milk on campus will make it easier for students, staff, and faculty to pursue academic work (and, indeed, all other work) at the University; and Whereas, according to the Faculty Senate Bylaws, the Council on Campus Planning and Usage is charged with making recommendations regarding new space needs or modifications required to support academic programs of the University; Therefore, be it resolved that the Council on Campus Planning and Usage will advocate for the creation of lactation rooms in appropriate locations across campus. The council will encourage and monitor progress toward the creation of these rooms and report back to the Senate at its first meeting of each semester until the Senate is satisfied that there are sufficient lactation rooms on campus. Senator Boynton asked where the creation of lactation rooms fits into the University抯 budget priorities, in terms of other stated priorities such as making classrooms safer. Western Organization for Women (WOW) President Bill Thompson responded that the lactation room proposed for the University Union is expected to cost between $7,500 and $10,000, although the cost will vary depending upon bringing buildings up to code. He said WOW cannot shoulder the entire cost of lactation rooms but will help raise money toward their creation. Senator Meloy pointed out that lactation facilities are important for the Quad Cities campus as well and wording on the resolution should be changed to recognize the need on both campuses. This was accepted as a friendly amendment. Senator Pynes asked if faculty members could offer their offices as places to express breast milk, such as when offices are designated 搒afe spaces.� He noted this would be a quick solution to the problem and would not require additional funding. Women抯 Studies Chair and WOW board member Polly Radosh informed senators that this option is available currently but has been found to be inadequate to the needs of nursing mothers. She also pointed out that Western needs to comply with existing state law. Dr. Radosh stated a small refrigerator and running water would be ideal in lactation rooms, but what is mainly needed is a private space that can be used exclusively for the purpose of expressing breast milk. The space must be sanitary and lockable. Dr. Thompson added that to designate someone抯 office as a lactation facility would be very inappropriate. He pointed out that while it would be difficult for one faculty member to ask another to leave his or her office so it can be used to express breast milk, it would be even harder for a student to make this request of a faculty member. Dr. Thompson stated that while the University currently is minimally compliant, it is not compliant to the level that it should achieve as an institution that speaks loudly for diversity and wants to be progressive. He expressed the need for neutral, publicly accessible spaces in University buildings open for long hours. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated it seems obvious that since establishment of lactation rooms is state law, Western must comply regardless of cost, and Faculty Senate should make it known that they support this effort. Senator Jelatis asked how the proposed resolution is different than one Faculty Senate passed last year supporting creation of lactation rooms at Western. Dr. Thompson explained the current resolution would designate the Senate抯 Council on Campus Planning and Usage as the body responsible for tracking progress on creation of lactation rooms. He added that Western抯 administration is not opposed to their creation but may need to be continually nudged to keep this issue to the forefront. RESOLUTION APPROVED 20 YES � 1 NO � 1 AB III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Council on Admission, Graduation and Academic Standards (Gayle Mericle, Chair) 1. Recommendation to Eliminate Constitution Exam Graduation Requirement CAGAS recommends elimination of the United States and Illinois Constitution Exam graduation requirement, which has been in place since Western was a 搉ormal� school for teachers. Only WIU, Illinois State, and Northeastern Illinois Universities still list the Constitution Exam as a graduation requirement, and some students do not graduate from 91仓库despite passing all other academic requirements except for this exam. The report from CAGAS points out that every Illinois high school student must pass the exam to graduate. Out-of-state or foreign students can meet the graduation requirement by taking either POLS 122 or a $2 test at the county courthouse. Elimination of the examination was approved by CAGAS on April 17 and also has the support of the 91仓库administration. NO OBJECTIONS 2. Recommendation to Support Revised Nursing Program Admissions Requirements Senators considered only admissions requirements for the RN-to-BSN Completion program; requirements for the combined Basic and RN-BSN programs will be considered at a later date. Changes had been made to the originally distributed document to replace the requirement of a 2.75 grade or better for individual courses to a grade of C. Nursing Program Director Lea Monahan explained that she eventually wants students to maintain a C+ in individual classes once plus-minus grading is implemented, but a 2.75 is actually closer to the B range than Dr. Monahan would wish. When asked when plus-minus grading is anticipated to be in effect, Chairperson Rock responded the best guess is that it will be implemented in fall 2009. Chairperson Rock added that since Western currently operates under a system of letter grades, it did not seem appropriate to express grades numerically in the Nursing admissions requirements at this time. A grade of 2.75 would remain in references to retention in the Nursing program; only references to individual class requirements would be changed to a grade of C. Senator Pynes noted that 2.75 does not normally refer to a grade of C, which is usually represented as a 2.0. Dr. Monahan responded that the 2.75 would be Western抯 specific requirement for retention in the program, adding that students will need to maintain a grade of C in their cumulative GPA and in their courses. Senator Blackinton stated she supports using a point system throughout the document rather than letter grades in some places and numeric references in others because determining a letter grade can become interpretive. Senator Edsall agreed, stating that it may become confusing once plus-minus grading is implemented to determine what is included in a C grade, which could be avoided by remaining with a numeric system throughout. Senator Siddiqi concurred that replacing references to C with 2.0 would be better in view of future plus-minus grading. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated he supports expressing the grade as a 2.0 rather than as a C because even though Western does not yet support plus-minus grading, other institutions which may be transferring students to Western do utilize plus-minus, and some students could make a case for admission with a C- if only the letter grade 揅� is used. Friendly amendment: Substitute 2.0 for a grade of C in references to individual classes. ADMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS APPROVED AS AMENDED B. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (Nancy Parsons, Chair) 1. Requests for New Courses a. AAS 455, Rural Roots of Urban African Americans, 3 s.h. b. ARTS 246, Digital Art Photography I, 3 s.h. c. ARTS 340, Intermediate Drawing, 3 s.h. When asked if it is typical for an art class to meet five hours per week, senators were told this is common practice. In Redistribution of Teaching Load, it is stated that ARTS 340 揷an be taught as a stacked class with Art 440.� Chairperson of the Department of Art Charles Wright explained that stacked classes are those taught together and count as one three-hour course in terms of ACE抯. This is commonly done in the arts; Senator Blackinton told senators that stacked courses are also offered in Theatre. Dr. Wright explained that ARTS 340 and 440 students will take their classes simultaneously in the same classroom but will study different levels of drawing. There are different requirements for each group of students and different syllabi for the two courses. d. BC 210, Broadcast Media Technology and Design, 3 s.h. e. EM 323, Emergency Preparedness and Response, 3 s.h. f. EM 324, Legal Aspects of Emergency Management, 3 s.h. g. EM 401, Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Recovery, 3 s.h. h. EM 420, Research Applications in Emergency Management, 3 s.h. i. WS 401, African American Women and Dance, 3 s.h. Senator Edsall remarked that the course objective for students to 揹emonstrate understanding of historical patterns in Black women抯 lives� seems too broad for the course. Dr. Radosh replied that students would have some understanding of this concept before enrolling in the course as this is also covered in an introductory and a 300-level course offered within the department. j. WS 495, Third-Wave Cinema, 3 s.h. NEW COURSES APPROVED 2. Requests for Changes in Options a. Applied Music b. Computer Science � Business c. Computer Science � Traditional CHANGES IN OPTIONS APPROVED 3. Requests for Changes in Majors a. Emergency Management b. Health Sciences c. Health Services Management d. Telecommunications Management CHANGES IN MAJORS APPROVED C. Writing Instruction in the Disciplines Committee (Jennifer McNabb, Chair) 1. Request for WID Inclusion a. HSM 315, Long Term Care Management, 3 s.h. HSM 315 APPROVED D. Committee on Committees (Kevin Hall, Chair) SENATE COUNCILS AND COMMITTEES: Writing Instruction in the Disciplines Kathy Barclay, Curriculum & Instr. replacing Katherine Pawelko 11 E&HS UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES: Committee on FYE Classes (new positions) Six faculty who are currently teaching or have taught FYE classes: Lisa Barr, English/Journalism Richard Gee, Sociology/Anthropology Betsy Perabo, Philosophy/Religious Studies John Stierman, University Libraries Oswald Warner, Sociology/Anthropology David Zanolla, Communication Two at-large faculty members: Samson Adeleke, Mathematics Jongnam Choi, Geography When asked why two faculty from the same department were nominated for the FYE positions when expressions of interest were received from 11 FYE faculty members, Senator Hall explained that CoC took into consideration current committees on which volunteers serve, whether the volunteer had filled out the February committee interest survey and had not been chosen for nomination at that time, and whether committee service might be needed for promotion and tenure. Six faculty had volunteered for the two at-large spots. When asked if it is traditional for CoC to designate whom the committee thinks should serve in vacant positions or whether the entire Senate should vote on all volunteers, Chairperson Rock explained that CoC normally brings forward a slate of candidates that it is up to the full Senate to confirm, or senators may submit additional nominations from the floor. There were no additional nominees for the positions. The slate of candidates was declared elected. E. Foreign Language/Global Issues Ad Hoc Committee (Marty Maskarinec, Chair) The ad hoc committee submitted its final report on operationalizing the requirements of the new foreign language/global issues (FLGI) graduation requirement. Under the new requirement, departments can specify that their majors will meet the requirement by either a) successful completion of an intermediate foreign language or demonstration of equivalent proficiency, b) taking a General Education course designated as 揋EGI,� c) taking a 300-level or higher course in the major or in another department designated and approved as 揇SGI,� or d) participation in a study abroad program of sufficient length and breadth as approved by Faculty Senate. The ad hoc committee recommends that the Council for International Education be named the body responsible for designating discipline-specific global issues (DSGI) courses, with the exception of general education global issues (GEGI) courses, which would be designated by the Council on General Education. The report recommends that the graduation requirement go into effect for all students beginning fall 2009. Senator Baker-Sperry questioned the process whereby a department could specify a course in another department as the DSGI course for their students. She asked if the originating department would need to give approval to another department to use one of its courses for their majors. Senator Boynton noted that the originating department would have to have enough faculty to offer a sufficient number of sections if the course is used as a DSGI course by another department. Senator Maskarinec responded that originating departments 搊wn� their courses and would be responsible for designating them as DSGI if desired. One department could not designate a course in a different department as the DSGI course for its majors if the originating department had not already submitted the appropriate paperwork to establish the course with that designation. Senator Brice asked if the Center for International Studies would also have the ability to designate courses as FLGI since they now have the authority to grant credit for their courses. Senator Maskarinec responded the recommendation extends only to the Council for International Education as having the authority to recognize FLGI courses. NO OBJECTIONS Senator Boynton thanked the committee for their hard work, and Chairperson Rock added the committee did an excellent job with their task. IV. Old Business C. Proposal for Making the Online Course Information Subcommittee a Permanent Faculty Senate Committee 1. Second reading and vote on Bylaws amendment Senator Boynton remarked that the database currently indicates that faculty have not yet turned in book orders, even when they have. Dr. Thompson, who was instrumental in developing the database, explained that when book orders are submitted, that information goes to the Union Bookstore. Bookstore employees check that faculty have submitted the correct titles and ISBN numbers of textbooks before sending the information on to STARS. Senator Boynton suggested that if the database could indicate that textbook information is pending, that would be better phraseology which would not imply that faculty have not yet submitted the information. Senator Hironimus-Wendt said he would like to go on record as opposing the proposal because 1) he still does not view the course information database as an issue of faculty welfare and only superficially as an issue of curriculum development, and 2) he sees the responsibilities involved in maintaining the database as being subsumed under the Senate抯 new Committee for Technology. Senator Hironimus-Wendt feels that creating a separate committee to manage the Bookstore抯 database does not seem to be the responsibility of Faculty Senate. Dr. Thompson disagreed that Faculty Senate would be managing the Bookstore抯 database. He said that one of the biggest differences between 91仓库and other universities is that Western has not outsourced its bookstore functions, which allows the interface between the Bookstore and Faculty Senate that resulted in the database. Dr. Thompson said that when he showed the database at the Educause Midwest Conference recently, institutions that would be unable to generate this kind of partnership because of proprietary arrangements with outside bookstores envied WIU抯 ability to do so. Dr. Thompson asserted that the Union Bookstore is performing a processing favor by checking book orders and passing the information on to STARS. He told senators this arrangement needs oversight by faculty willing to look after the health and welfare of the database. Dr. Thompson informed senators that glitches discovered in the system will be worked out over the summer, and a feature will be added so that students can directly use the ISBN numbers in the database to google for their books online. He said that since the computing infrastructure at 91仓库is complicated, some entity needs to push for these kinds of improvements and ask programmers to fix issues that arise. Senator Pynes expressed his agreement with Senator Hironimus-Wendt, stating it seems that this committee could function equally well under the proposed Senate Committee for Technology. Chairperson Rock responded he sees the two committees as separate in terms of their missions. He explained the Committee for Technology would address issues of classroom technology and serve as a liaison between faculty and the administration on computing issues, while the database committee would interface between faculty and students in terms of providing course information. Senator Miczo said he would like to go on record as opposing creation of a standing online course information committee because submission of course information was intended to be voluntary but promoting the system could lead to mandates from department chairs for faculty to participate in the process. He pointed out that disseminating information about the availability of the database is not the same as promoting it, which involves a coordinated, persuasive effort. Senator Boynton remarked that one reason to retain control of the database within Faculty Senate would be to maintain the faculty role and keep it voluntary. She knows of other universities where similar systems began with voluntary participation and were later mandated for faculty. She also expressed concerns about promoting a consumer mentality to students who wish to take the easiest courses. Senator Boynton stated that while she is not a big fan of the course information database, if it is going to exist she would like to see faculty retain ownership of it. Senator Thompson agreed that submission of course information should remain absolutely voluntary. He said legislation being discussed in Springfield would mandate that state universities must make textbook information available to students, so 91仓库is already ahead of the curve. BYLAWS AMENDMENT FAILED 2 YES � 13 NO � 7 AB D. Proposal for a Faculty Senate Ad Hoc Committee for Technology Senator Sonnek noted that a new chief technology security officer was recently hired for the University and she is unsure of the role of the many technology administrators and committees. She would like to know how many technology committees the University currently has, who are on them, and where they are housed. Senator Maskarinec, who proposed the committee, responded that its creation is intended to answer these types of questions. He noted that whenever the University wishes to undertake a technology initiative, it creates a new technology committee, yet faculty feel they have no single place to address their technology questions and issues. Senator Maskarinec stated his goal is to create a unified place to which all technology questions can be directed from Faculty Senate. He said President Goldfarb has approved a position for a new chief technology information officer, different from the chief technology security officer, but this position will not be filled until the reorganization of technology units on campus is completed. In response to questions about possible membership, Senator Maskarinec said he proposes two faculty from each college with the committee deciding which technology administrators should be added as members. He said the committee would be dominated by faculty representation. Provost Thomas stated that when deans recently expressed concerns about where to address technology issues, Joe Rives told them these issues should be brought to the attention of the technology representative within each college. Dr. Thomas said the intention is that technology representatives in each college will be able to deal with issues within that college抯 departments, and Dr. Rives is working on refining this system. Dr. Thompson indicated his support of the proposed committee, pointing out that technology is an integral part of the University to the point where without it, the University would find it difficult to exist. He said when something is that important to the life of the University and to the success of its pedagogical mission, the Faculty Senate needs to have a voice. He listed future changes to Zimbra or considerations of whether the University should participate in Internet 2, which would change a lot of faculty research agendas, as discussions in which the proposed committee could contribute. Senator Baker-Sperry stated her agreement with Dr. Thompson in terms of a Faculty Senate voice on technology issues. She sees the role of the new chief technology officer and college reps as very different from that of a Faculty Senate committee. She added that the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Research (CITR) is not closely linked with faculty governance, and bringing an issue before a committee is very different than taking a concern through a department chair, dean, and college technology representative. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also expressed his support for the proposal but said he would like to see an intentional linkage with CITR as part of the composition. He added this committee could provide a place to send the proposal for the online course information subcommittee. Senator Maskarinec said he could see this committee supporting issues from the online course information subcommittee proposal. He said communication and collaboration are what are needed in a technology committee. Parliamentarian Kaul expressed his support of the proposed committee because faculty have no direct input on technology changes, but suggested that the wording 搕echnology� in the proposal be changed to 搃nformation technology� because 搕echnology� is a broad term that can include such items from a telescope for Physics to a mass spectrometer for Chemistry. Senator Maskarinec would support a name change for the committee. Senator Pynes has not been particularly impressed with the technology changes implemented by Dr. Rives. He related that Dr. Rives said at a meeting that migration to Zimbra was voluntary and employees could use whatever mail system they wished but it would not continue to be supported by Western. Senator Pynes noted that this has not been the case, and faculty should not be forced to use a software program inadequate to their daily tasks. Senator Pynes objected to the way Zimbra was presented to the University and to the way technology is presented to faculty, and said he would support the creation of the new committee if it would prevent faculty from having to use technology from the mid-1990抯. Ms. Kornoski remarked that the Zimbra migration seemed to be voluntary up to a point. Student leaders were targeted first for migration, followed by those that voluntarily migrated; then, two weeks after spring break, those students who had not voluntarily migrated were made to do so. Senator Pynes related he told Dr. Rives he did not appreciate having to switch from one email provider to another, and Dr. Rives claimed employees were not forced to do so. Senator Pynes stated that employees could utilize another email system prior to the implementation of Zimbra 5.0.2., but now email cannot be forwarded to another account. Parliamentarian Kaul disagreed, stating this is still possible. Friendly amendment: To strike 揳d hoc� from the committee title and to add the word 搃nformation� before technology (Siddiqi) Senator Maskarinec feels the term 搃nformation technology� is too limiting for the proposed committee. He pointed out that a DVD player used in the classroom is not information technology but is technology that may be addressed in future by the committee. He added that the examples of technology provided earlier by Parliamentarian Kaul are very specific to a department so would not be considered by the proposed committee unless they were of general interest to all faculty. Parliamentarian Kaul feels some distinction needs to be made to indicate more specificity than the term 搕echnology� provides. He noted that a lathe is a form of technology that clearly would not be part of the discussion of this committee. Senator Clontz suggested that distinctions of what types of technology will be considered or discussed will be brought out once the duties of the committee are submitted for Bylaws consideration in the fall. Senator Edsall suggested that 搃nstructional technology� would fit the proposed scope of the committee. Senator Maskarinec supported changing the title to 揅ommittee for Instructional Technology.� Senator Sonnek supports the proposed committee, stating that it would address the need expressed by Provost Thomas for faculty voices in different departments to be heard in regards to technology needs. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also expressed his support and asked that Faculty Senate impose structure for the committee at this point. Friendly amendment: That Faculty Senate create a committee consisting of three faculty members per college and charge the committee to come forward next semester with its responsibilities (Hironimus-Wendt) Dr. Thompson requested that Faculty Senate consider adding a faculty member from the Library to the committee membership since University Libraries is the unit with the largest technology budget in the University and impacts all other 91仓库units. Senator Orwig stated his support for a specified Library representative, pointing out that as the owners of much technology, a Library voice on the committee would be very appropriate. Senator Maskarinec supported membership consisting of three faculty per college and one faculty member from University Libraries. Faculty would serve three-year staggered terms. SENATOR ORWIG CALLED THE QUESTION CREATION OF A 13-MEMBER (3 faculty per college, 1 faculty from Libraries) COMMITTEE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY APPROVED 22 YES � 0 NO � 0 AB Senator Maskarinec will bring forward specific duties and wording for the Faculty Senate Bylaws to the first fall Senate meeting. Committee on Committees will begin to solicit names for committee membership. V. New Business A. Proposed Resolution in Support of Legislation Legalizing Civil Unions Whereas, 91仓库's non discrimination policy advocates for the equality of its members in the workplace and before the law; and Whereas, the lack of same sex marriage creates inequities in the workplace and before the law; and Whereas, the inability to form civil unions also creates inequities in the workplace and before the law; and Whereas, Senators David Koehler, Heather Steans, and Iris Martinez have introduced SB2436, Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, that would legalize civil unions and obviate the above inequities; and Whereas, Representatives Gregg Harris, Sara Feigenholtz, Harry Osterman, Constance Howard, Barbara Flynn Currie, John A. Fritchey, Lou Lang, George Schully, Jr., Julie Hamos, Cynthia Soto, and Richard T. Bradley have introduced HB1826, Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, that would legalize civil unions and obviate the above inequities; and Whereas, the 91仓库 President is on record as supporting same civil unions; Therefore, be it resolved that the Faculty Senate asks the University President or his appointed designee to actively lobby the legislature for the passage of SB2436 and HB1826. Senator Miczo asked if it often happens that Faculty Senate undertakes the kind of activist role requested by the proposed resolution. He noted that since the resolution takes a position on a proposal that is not yet state law, the Senate is being asked to undertake lobbying duties, as opposed to the Senate抯 previously-approved resolution in support of lactation rooms, which has already been signed into law. Senator Miczo asserted that once the legislation passes, it would be appropriate for Faculty Senate to take a stand in support of implementing a law. He acknowledged that there is value in the basis for the arguments contained in the resolution, but said he feels uncomfortable having Faculty Senate support it because senators are supposed to represent faculty who, presumably, may have underlying values that prevent them from being in favor of civil union legislation. He expressed discomfort with Faculty Senate taking a position on this legislation as a body that is supposed to represent a diversity of faculty viewpoints. Dr. Thompson told senators one reason he brought forward the resolution is that if the law is passed, the domestic partner problem in regard to dependent health insurance coverage would become a moot point, which directly affects faculty well being. He related that President Goldfarb has already asked University lobbyists to support this legislation, but the President indicated at the last Senate meeting that he would like it if Faculty Senate also sent a message so that he can indicate the body representing the faculty voice supports this legislation as well. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated his support for the resolution in principal, but finds the last line troublesome. He stated the Faculty Senate Chair lobbies on behalf of the Faculty Senate, not the President, and the line seems to assume that senators should lobby on behalf of the faculty on this issue. Senator Hironimus-Wendt hopes faculty support the proposed law, but believes senators have no understanding of the will of faculty as a whole on this issue, and although a senator at-large, he does not think he can speak on behalf of all 91仓库faculty. The senator stated he could support asking President Goldfarb to make clear to the legislature the feelings of senators on this issue, but the last line of the resolution seems to indicate that Senate is speaking on behalf of faculty at-large whose feelings are not known. Senator Boynton personally supports the law, but agrees she does not know where faculty as a whole stand on this issue. She pointed out that senators regularly vote on curricular issues without knowing the feelings of all faculty, but this is a different kind of issue which affects some faculty抯 religious beliefs. Senator Boynton stated she is uncomfortable supporting the resolution without polling faculty to see how they feel about the proposed law. Senator Miczo remarked President Goldfarb wishes to be able to say he speaks for the faculty, but it is unknown how many faculty are even aware of the bill and want Faculty Senate to endorse it. Although hesitant to call for a survey, Senator Miczo feels a lot of intermediate steps are being bypassed for politically-motivated reasons and is not sure Faculty Senate wants to be caught up in this issue. Senator Hironimus-Wendt asked if Dr. Thompson would consider changing the last line of the resolution to strike the phrase 揳ctively lobby the legislature� and replace it with 搃ndicate Faculty Senate抯 support.� Dr. Thompson asked who the President would indicate Faculty Senate抯 support to, stating that if he is to indicate Faculty Senate抯 support to the legislature, there seems to be no difference between this and lobbying the legislature. Senator Hironimus-Wendt responded that rather than requiring the President to lobby on behalf of Faculty Senate, he would prefer the resolution to state that Faculty Senate supports the proposed law without indicating that the Senate is speaking on behalf of all faculty. Friendly amendment: Replace the phrase 揳ctively lobby the legislature� with 搒upports the passage of� (Maskarinec). Dr. Thompson accepted the amendment. Senator Pynes expressed his support for the resolution, which he said addresses an important issue because genuine inequities exist in the current law. He does not see how Senate can object to the removal of certain inequities through civil unions yet supported the previous resolution addressing inequities in health insurance for dependents of domestic partners. Parliamentarian Kaul also expressed his support of the resolution. He stated that it is presumed that Faculty Senate is the de facto voice of the faculty in other discussions and does not see why this issue is different. Senator Blackinton asked if using phraseology indicating 搕he members of Faculty Senate� rather than just 揊aculty Senate� would make the resolution more clear, but Parliamentarian Kaul said this would mean the same thing. Senator Baker-Sperry remarked that senators are elected to represent faculty and do it all the time; if a faculty member is concerned about his or her representative making decisions indicating the will of the faculty, that person should attend every meeting and be concerned about every decision made at Faculty Senate. Senator Boynton agreed that when Faculty Senate speaks, it speaks on behalf of the faculty. She said some faculty have expressed their opposition to the proposed legislation to her, but no scientific polling of her college has occurred so she has no knowledge how the majority of those faculty she represents feel about this issue. Senator Boynton said she is unsure that eliminating reference to lobbying from the proposed resolution addresses that concern. Senator Pynes noted that senators are unable to represent every faculty member on any particular issue on which they vote since senators are only allowed one vote apiece. Senator Blackinton said she is personally in favor of the resolution, but that if some are opposed to it, undecided about the issue, or concerned about whether faculty as a whole have been asked their opinions, it would look horrible for Faculty Senate to vote it down at this time. Senator Sonnek said she tries to send a message to faculty in her department when issues arise but she has not done so for this proposed resolution. She said while faculty may not always agree with the decision of Faculty Senate, it may be 搕ouchy� for Senate to vote this resolution through. Senator Jelatis said she has no problem voting on what is in the best interests of faculty regarding curricular matters, but she does not feel comfortable voting on this proposal. She stated if Faculty Senate starts voting on what senators believe is good for the faculty politically, she does not know what future direction such an action might take. Senator Jelatis concluded that she is uncomfortable voting on something she feels is outside of her charge as a senator. Senator Baker-Sperry asked what sort of obligation Faculty Senate is under in regard to the disposition of the resolution since there are significant concerns about what faculty feel on this issue. Chairperson Rock responded that Faculty Senate could consider tabling the issue if desired. SENATOR HIRONIMUS-WENDT CALLED THE QUESTION MOTION TO CALL THE QUESTION APPROVED 18 YES � 3 NO � 1 AB RESOLUTION FAILED 6 YES � 8 NO � 8 AB Motion: To adjourn (Brice/Orwig) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:34 p.m. Darlos Mummert, Secretary Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary PAGE PAGE 6 3ABKMSXZ]dq�� % 泐最私顧顜顎钭uj頮T領haa�h跴CJaJhaa�h�+CJaJhaa�hp}�CJaJhaa�h嘆_CJaJhaa�hIy CJaJhaa�h�7�5�>*CJaJhaa�h7#�CJaJh=Q�CJaJhaa�h鏔|5�6丆JaJhaa�huu5�6丆JaJhaa�hIy 5�6丆JaJhaa�h�7�6丆JaJhaa�h�7�5丆JaJhaa�h#�CJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�7�BYZd�� *+XYst�� 勦⺗� `勦�@&$a$$@&a$@&% 0 9 M Y r | � � � � � � � � � " 2 C m € � � � � � � � � )*+/蹶咴呱境蹙赃觉擐呱擐咴湋溸溕喩溕{p渰甚嗊haa�hJ�CJaJhaa�hJ�CJaJhaa�h$,+CJaJhaa�h7#�CJaJhaa�h阹OCJaJhaa�h�7�5丆JaJhaa�h�<:CJaJhaa�h跴CJaJhaa�h�+CJaJhaa�huuCJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�hOCJaJhaa�h鏔|CJaJ(/GJKLSWX[grtx��TW`bj��箬菀萸杓挨拌槏鑱vjv^S^SGhaa�h�6�5丱JQJhaa�h�6�CJaJhaa�h�6�5丆JaJhaa�h�2�5丆JaJhaa�h�2�CJaJhaa�h�2�>*CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�h{.�>*CJaJhaa�h隩+5丆JaJhaa�h�7�5丆JaJhaa�h軵oCJaJhaa�h嘆_CJaJhaa�h隩+CJaJhaa�hJ�CJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�7�>*CJaJt��VW��"AB��wwn��$劆^劆gd�6�劆�^劆`�gd�6�m$<� 芢`�0��Tp��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I劆刞鷁劆`刞鷊d�2�= 芲`�0��Tp@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d�7��p x � � &.��"&@ADG`ee€��&>?@ACSTUV蹰蹰蹰蹰蹰蹰蹀仪急ケ殠殠殠毐寝莻wlahaa�h緆�CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�7�>*CJaJhaa�h輒>*CJaJhaa�h輒CJaJhaa�h醕X>*CJaJhaa�h醕XCJaJhaa�hOFCJaJhaa�h跴CJaJhaa�hOF>*颁闯补闯丑补补�丑�2�颁闯补闯丑补补�丑�6�5丱闯蚕闯丑补补�丑�6�翱闯蚕闯#叠缚补��翱触��镑��词词词词词词词词�<� 芢`�0��8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒<� 芢`�0��8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒 ��gd醕X^_��K�K�<� 芢`�0�X8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒<� 芢`�0��8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒<� 芢`�0�X8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒�� '+>��碍��<� 芢`�0��8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒<� 芢`�0�X8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒<� 芢`�0��8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d輒>?TUlm+,��JJJJJ: 芛`�0��T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I劆�0齘劆`�0齡d�2�= 芲`�0��Tp@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d�7�<� 芢`�0��8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d隩+Vm ��kl��ab�~��FG��!"-"1"T"_"`"c"d"h"�"�"�"�"[#a#�#�#�#�#蹶怅怅滋租租租租琢盗琢獥翖彈儣�h鉯�hw56丆JaJh�9�CJaJhaa�hw5CJaJh鉯�CJaJhaa�h@B�CJaJhaa�h馟5丆JaJhaa�h馟CJaJhaa�h萫CJaJhaa�h3 CJaJhnICJaJhaa�h�6�CJaJhaa�h� �CJaJ3��bc��!!�$�$N&O&d(e(?*@*�+�+-��: 芛`�0��T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I劆�0齘劆`�0齡d�2��#$!$�$N&�&�'�'�'�'�'�'c(d(�(�(�(�(�(>*?*q*V+[+�+�+, ,-----蹴踱滋教桨教滋ヌヌ毺弰韯弰韯yncXhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�2�CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�h-,�CJaJhaa�h�(^CJaJhaa�h'RCJaJhaa�h@B�CJaJhaa�h�<:CJaJhaa�h悀�0JCJaJjhaa�h悀�CJUaJhaa�h悀�CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�hb&�CJaJh�9�CJaJhaa�hw5CJaJ --B-}-~-0.1.I.J.�.�.�/�/��yyttttkt刾^刾gdg�gdGx劆^劆gd�(^勑^勑<� 芢`�0��Tp��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I劆刞鷁劆`刞鷊d]G�: 芛`�0��T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I劆�0齘劆`�0齡d軵o-:-A-}-~-/.0.1.2.3.5.H.I.O.�.�.�.�.�.8/:/�/�/�/X0\0�0�0�0�0(1)1*121�1�1�1�1�1箸苎苹苹郴Щ湊湀湀湀溒渳坿坿坿苹q}f}q}haa�hvr�CJaJhaa�h`_ 5丆JaJhaa�h`_ CJaJh�9�CJaJhaa�hg�>*CJaJhaa�hg�CJaJhaa�hGx>*CJaJh "CJaJhaa�hGxCJaJhaa�h�(^CJaJhaa�h萫CJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�7�>*CJaJhaa�h��>*CJaJ&�/)1*1�1�1�1�1�1�1728233�3�3�4�4�4�� &F劆�0齘劆`�0齡d`_ 5 芲`�0��8T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd`_ gd`_ 劆^劆gd`_ gdGx刾�0齘刾`�0齡dg��1�1�18292A233�3�3�3�4�4�4�4�45555 5a5b5c5�6�6�6�6&7-7.7/7�7�7�7~8�8�8�8h:7;=;_;�<��<�Z=l=�=�=�=�=�=�=h>箬箬荑荑荑谚雅梵芙附豹舰苯副礁奖礁雹苯睕敍敱攲攬攬攬�h�9�h�9�hJ�5�haa�hJ�haa�hw%�haa�h�<:6�haa�h7{�haa�h�<: h�9�5�haa�h�<:5�haa�h�<:5丆JaJhaa�h�<:CJaJhaa�h`_ 5丆JaJhaa�h`_ CJaJhaa�h`_ >*颁闯补闯5�4�455产5�6�6%7&7�7�7�8�8驳:丑:�<��<�n=o=�� &F劆^劆gd�<: &F勣刾�0齗勣^刾`�0齡d�<: &F劆�0齘劆`�0齡dw%� &F刾�0齘刾`�0齡d��gd`_ &Fgd`_ &F劆�0齘劆`�0齡d`_ h>~>�>H?R?X?a?�?�?BHBIBKBWBZB桞楤諦譈跙鍮鬊魾CC匔轈怑朎盓糆螮蠩袳鶨鸈麰F#F%F'F*FaF丗臚囝囝帙噘锗钹袜苹崅vhaa�haa�>*CJaJhaa�hg�CJaJhaa�hg�>*CJaJhaa�h[t�CJaJhaa�hY|�CJaJhaa�h�7�>*CJaJhaa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�<:haa�hg�5�h "haa�hJ�haa�hg�haa�h*g�h�9�haa�haa�haa�h�)�-o=CC蠩袳鸈麰%F&FbF{F|F荈菷諭譏鐸镮8J9J僋凬萇�� 刾剱鱚刾`剱鱣d衐� ��gd癋e &F勣刾�0齗勣^刾`�0齡d�<: &F劆^劆gd�<:臚薋贔跢HH)I0I誌諭贗隝領7J8J婯wLM#M(M淢滿㎝軲馦鮉CNbNfN侼嘚蔔鯪鵑璒荗蒓4Q5Q鬛SPSQSUS蹶怅陉怅详藐逢柆‖猬猬猬栤枊瑡瑬瑎枊♀鈰�haa�hw{LCJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�h卪CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�hbx.CJaJhaa�hbx.>*CJaJhaa�h衐�5丆JaJhaa�hg�CJaJh "CJaJh�9�CJaJhaa�h衐�CJaJhaa�haa�CJaJ-萇蒓QSRS甋疭逽郤T,T-TKTLT奣糡門闠鬢鮓1XkX�� gd� � ��凘^凘gd衐� ��gd�� gd癋e ��刾剱鱚刾`剱鱣d衐�US_SiS琒睸蒘蔛軸逽銼TT2T9T:TITJTLTOTPT峊嶵縏繲襏鳺鵚4X5XkXoXpX╔琗璛隭靀頧箸苎笱箸坪簶簶倣倣倣w倃倃l俵al俵俵haa�h0]wCJaJhaa�h*I]CJaJhaa�h� �CJaJhaa�h�5CJaJhaa�h衐�CJaJhaa�h&s�>*颁闯补闯丑补补�丑��颁闯补闯丑补补�丑+闭�颁闯补闯丑补补�丑��>*颁闯补闯丑补补�丑驳�颁闯补闯丑补补�丑��颁闯补闯丑补补�丑卪颁闯补闯丑补补�丑卪5丆闯补闯丑补补�丑��5丆闯补闯&办齿╔鏧,驰诲驰别驰鑊閆摆摆.摆/摆鲍摆痴摆办摆岳砾禰譡豙齕㘚袄��<� 芢`�0�X8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d0]w頧+Y3YjY鏩鑊鞿頩[[[%[-[5[T[礫籟譡轠黐\\~\沑焅蟎骪]M]^]c]d]e]g]~]榏禲筣遐遐疒厦访讷谙废熛椣废熛熛峰屜寑宷chaa�hr�5丆J\乤Jhaa�hr�5�>*CJ\乤Jhaa�h[t�>*CJaJhaa�h[t�CJaJh��CJaJhaa�h舧�>*CJaJhaa�h�5>*CJaJhaa�h舧�5丆JaJhaa�h�55丆JaJhaa�h舧�CJaJhaa�h�5CJaJhaa�h*I]CJaJh�9�CJaJh� �CJaJ%\1\S\x\y\橽歕衆靄韁 ]]D]H]^]c]��<� 芢`�0��8�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d舧�<� 芢`�0�X8p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF I凘劺鬪凘`劺鬵d0]wc]]昡朷竇筣郵'^��faTC剺�勑勑]剺⺗勑`勑gd=t勑勑^勑`勑gdrgdr�2 芛`�0�X�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd癋e2 芛`�0�X�p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd[t�2 芛`�0��p@��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd[t�筣遌郵^^ ^^"^&^(^=^@^X^h^i^j^l^璣廮玙鎋`)`=aAa餫%b*bLbMbTb_bXcYc胏騝蜴谖孚孚婵彬広€趢趖╰╰h╤╤╤趆Zhaa�h菺>*CJ\乤Jhaa�h菺CJ\乤Jhaa�h�$CJ\乤Jh� �h=t>*CJ\乤Jhaa�hr�>*CJ\乤Jh� �hr�CJ\乤Jh� �CJ\乤Jhaa�hr�5丆J\乤Jhaa�hr�5�>*CJ\乤Jhaa�hrCJ\乤Jhaa�h=tCJ\乤Jhaa�hr�CJ\乤Jhaa�h=t>*CJ\乤J#'^(^?^@^i^j^痎蟐骬 _D_l_宊峗璤薩錩鎋YcZc綾縞骳dd��gd菺劆^劆gd�$勑勑^勑`勑gd=t勑勑^勑`勑gdrgdr�騝廳杁鈊㩳礶積%f'fg9g;g=g>gEg^gg乬僩刧h/h痟県醜駃骾鱥鴌�ijj坖謏鮦恔慿譳鱧閘鱨俶僲噈搈昺箨筠筠筠笳摅阵拚摅阵摅摅赊丈奚奖毡毡笊ㄉ毶巸w�haa�h�s>*CJaJhaa�h�sCJaJhaa�h=tCJ\乤Jhaa�h�,�5丆J\乤Jhqh�CJ\乤Jhaa�hO.�CJ\乤Jhaa�h極�CJ\乤Jhaa�h�,�CJ\乤JhAcCJ\乤Jhaa�hT�CJ\乤Jh� �CJ\乤Jhaa�h菺CJ\乤J.d9h:h慿択鑜閘鱨鴏俶僲昺杕齧龸/n0n穚�� &F刾^刾gd�� &F劆�0齘劆`�0齡d�� &Fgd<:�5 芲`�0��8T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd�sgdr�劆^劆gd菺昺杕檓黰龸nn.n/nlpqp蟩趒8rZt[tatjt蛅閠韙uu蕎藈&x*xWxjxkxlxtx儀 {{3{質銃~~4cg��箬筌箬笮枧脚脚钵钵矞敎敎艤敎敎敎敎敎墧墱墧墋壭�haa�h��5丆JaJhaa�h��CJaJhqh�CJaJhaa�h醁8CJaJhaa�h-y#CJaJhaa�hO.�CJaJhAcCJaJhaa�h��CJaJhaa�h��>*颁闯补闯丑补补�丑��>*颁闯补闯丑补补�丑<:�CJaJhaa�h<:�>*CJaJ/穚竝藈蘷zz~~34bc��苾莾趧蹌墕妴迣邔寧崕 �� &F劆^劆gd俻� &F劆^劆gdEB� &Fgd�� &F刾^刾gd��鶃��艃苾莾葍趧鰟麆妴S�a�h�鎴獘珛:�D�輰迣I�J�嫀寧搹煆稄� �4�=�蛽� ��"�#�/�櫂贅軜鳂鴺�蹴踱踝踝碜塘塘俄俄蹲俄懂︘頌頌頌枍栱枀}卹�hkf.hkf.CJaJh翽�CJaJheMRCJaJhkf.5丆JaJhkf.CJaJh砛'CJaJhaa�CJaJh-y#CJaJhaa�h-y#CJaJhaa�h丗�CJaJhaa�hMCJaJhaa�h俻�CJaJhaa�h��CJaJhqh�CJaJhaa�hEB�CJaJ, ��寯崝鴺鶚H�I��}�~�牆1�2��5 芲`�0��8T��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd�s &F凩�劆]凩�^劆gd詔� &F劆^劆gdkf. &F劆^劆gdEB��艡鞕饳G�H�I�]�瘺硾�@�崪枩蕼|�}�~�1�2��_�`�a�b�i�j�桫桊柽桫桫枳柘柘描细灄垊}rf]h58�5丆JaJh�>jh�>j5丆JaJh�>jh�>jCJaJh�>箩丑�>箩丑<:�h]4�h]4�>*haa�h<:�haa�he>yhaa�h�9�>*haa�h�9�haa�h杘bCJaJhkf.hkf.CJaJh詔�h翽�5丆JaJh翽�CJaJh58�CJaJhkf.5丆JaJhkf.CJaJh砛'CJaJhqh�CJaJ"��`�a�鳠鵁\�]�藸虪��~�2�H�I�儶劒铆沫幆�� &F劆^劆gd詔� &F劆^劆gd�>j劆^劆gd�>j劆刞鷁劆`刞鷊d�>j &Fgd�9�j�k�鵁��]�d�e�f�虪訝誀病场F�G��"�#�$�~�棧1�2�撺妤h��懅ěG�H� ��:�P�霆Q�R�V�W�_�w�牞が痊莠�!�)�颅铆醐:�旬瀹锂鲭咧鲭咧唠咧脒蛛坞咧鲭瓶环撤С厂ЙНЙЙЙh膁bh膁b6�h膁bh歕Sh-;kh58�h詔�h]4�h�>jh�>jh�>jh�>j5�h58�CJaJh58�5丆JaJh�>jh�>j5丆JaJh�>jh�>jCJaJh�>j5丆JaJ>幆彲$�%�柎棿��劵吇抢壤衾趵0�1�X�Y�z�{�� &F, 芃��€P ��!�$`'0*-�/�2p5@8;�=癅€CPF Igd6@ &Fgd�9� &F劆^劆gd詔�锂S�壈$�绮 ��Y�x�浅顺�"�C�G�I�暣柎惖摰�叾嵍h�{��"�d�i�匣踊砘� �-�8�熂@�F�毥敖步��咕谰途揖饩渚锞缶:�I�箍究婵�$�h�评抢壤X�Y�a�m�麴麴麴綦豇豇豇麴翮哏痃痃痃痃痃痃痃垧圩鹱鹱鹱鹱鹱幼鹱鹱鹱鹱缱四腑haa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h�7�5丆JaJhaa�h<:�h瑉�h瑉�5�h gh瑉�hp5�h鏺�h鏺�6�h鏺� h.�5�h58�h.�h ~h膁bDm�s�x�z�{�浟溋澚熈�� $�%�&�'�(�*�+�,�蹶哓咄咄呗吆逗逗逗冬ΜΒ瑮⒍�h "0JmHnHuh� h�0Jjh�0JUh籿�jh籿�Uhaa�hc}jCJaJhaa�hiy+CJaJhaa�h�7�haa�h�7�CJaJhaa�h<:�CJaJhaa�h�=CJaJ!{�┝闪狭�� 匋��&`#$! &F � ��p@��€`$劆凱霡&^劆`凱靏dc}j &F ��p@��€劆凱霡&^劆`凱� &F ��p@��€劆凱靆劆`凱� &F@&��(�)�*�+�,��! &F � ��p@��€`$劆凱霡&^劆`凱靏dc}j匋��&`#$5 01恏:p杘b靶/ 班=!�8"�*#愋$恏%�靶靶愋^%2�� 0@P`p€��2(�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�8X�V~_HmH nH sH tH @`�@NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH PP Heading 1$ &F ��@&>*CJaJRR Heading 2$ &F劆@&^劆5丆J\乤JHH Heading 3$ &F@&>*CJaJJJ Heading 4$ &F@&5丆J\乤JZZ Heading 5$ &F剺�劆@&]剺⺗劆5丆J\乤JDA`��DDefault Paragraph FontVi��VTable Normal :V�4�4� la�(k ��(No ListX�/��XLevel 1勑7$8$H$^勑OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X�/�XLevel 4凘7$8$H$^凘OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X�/�XLevel 3刾7$8$H$^刾OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X�/�"XLevel 5�7$8$H$^�OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC2XBody Text Indent ��勑^勑>*CJaJ6BB6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4Footer ��!.)@�a.Page NumberXR@rXBody Text Indent 2 &F勑^勑CJaJ6U@��6 Hyperlink>*B*ph�XS�XBody Text Indent 3 &F劆^劆CJaJB>@�BTitle$凩�^凩�a$5丆J\乤JFV��FFollowedHyperlink>*B*ph€€ZY�ZDocument Map-D M� �€CJOJQJ^JaJtN1�tBody Text First Indent 2 ��刪勔^刪`勔>*CJaJ@��@ WP9_Title$1$a$5乤Jh^�hNormal (Web)&勧勧d�[$\$]勧^勧CJOJQJaJ*W�*Strong5乗�6�6level1![$\$H�"HBalloon Text"CJOJQJ^JaJ$��1$訶7objectf矦Bf�6� List Paragraph$勑dと^勑m$CJOJPJQJ^JaJPK!倞��[Content_Types].xml瑧薺�0E鲄䞍卸豶�(ヘ微Iw},�浔-j弰4 蛇w旄P�-t#b螜{U畯銧擉T閁^h卍}悒)蛔*1P�' 揯鬃W孱0)櫐T闉9<搇�#ぼ$yi}佸;纞@囨�(顚跄H滖男u�*D谞z內/0娗盃瘥�$€�X3aZ⒁锣,癉0j~�3叨蝏沩~i>�赝3縗`�?�/�[�G殁\�!�-跼k.搒粣..椃碼婵�?��PK!ブх�6_rels/.rels剰蟡�0囷吔冄}Q颐%v/C/�(h"�脎O� �劋秣�=孂釘� 毆免C?薶醰=�偵叅�%[xp啠{鄣_糚眩<�1�0�堎O糝瓸d焉襃E�4b$q_�槥�6L吁R�7`畯ㄉ�趁0虨O��,錏n7擫i鋌〃/鉙綈╡械根铸��PK!ky��theme/theme/themeManager.xml蘉 � @醹愘7c�(Eb菜�C�A菭覠圩邈�7芜諞K Y,� 奺�.埛饇,�ㄚH�,l崆骈x纱�逫萻Q}#諓叚递值+�!�,較�$j=婫W栌�)釫�+& 8��PK!柕�Ptheme/theme/theme1.xml靁Oo�6�豾 toc'vu娯睕-M膎�i墫豍襂}阢€煤a�豰嘺[�廿�4�:l携癎R捙X^�6貖�>$�┇最�!)O赹齬虲$駓@摪磔�/瓂H*�橊劥�)戅祶鬟粖譛Db俙}"譹蹕擩讞枻肵^�)I`n蘀�紛p)�杵li筕[]�1M<斷绒彥O蠵擊6r�=瘔抸纆b營g吜u崘S賓b嘱€O缽嗕掘肦罝郢櫉反qu 痝嫎Z岸串o~俸lAp發x妏T0�+[}`j纂鹾絲A�帮儲V�2虵蒳朄鰍瀡分�5\|夻蕼汰Nвle瞂�ds趈cs倭惻7琊嵨f坊赅肉W琊�+唻7爤唁`�陲g�葮稠J�雷j|唫h(�驞-姷咩� dX�﹊J曝�(钼x$(��:隶;渌�!�I_蠺到S1ｗ犍鳢�?E��?勉?ZB为m渼錟/魁煜��?瀪篁�誼Y�'奎鼀5襣&螊/燑鲮蓩�>籊餗丟e鴲艱�眢3Vq%'#q��域娡$�8翚K秊�敉)f檞9:牡�澹 x}r�x墘�渨⒇顁�:\TZaG�*檡8I耲鎎R祈c|X呕�强絀 u3KG駈D1�NIB襰鼆� 眍R曦u楘侹>V�.EL+M2�#'歠嫸i~橵�l硔u8z�篐� �*�鏄�:�(W�鈽� ~J攘T鴈\O*餿HG絸HY垫�}KN吡P�*菥甩眿�T鸭�9/#辐A7聁Z��$*c?��韖U咤n嗚w�N蝴%幓O�穒鑸4=3跅P獫愉锸1弇\\9�肭戸�釳負�2a鸇鵠�;Yt籠繇[x掛簌嶇]蓕Wr�|蒥斚g-闯� eW� �)6-r及CS�j嗜 i歞鸇袊A轿�IqbJ#x剃簝6k愢�#A凷h半�&蕦t(Q�%焯p%m崌&]賑aSl=怷眚�狳\P�1籑h�9�M喱蘓甦DA碜aV譈潤[輬fJ澝璓|8�謩A�V^咉筬蘃犿n鬓�-��"醼d>襷消╪湐菉� €丞饝>錆b�窎&�芪猡2黄v棍弈Ky霞ん鯠:菠湝,AGm\nz惹i�脵��.u蠂YC�6霴Mf撳3o秗跑$5叺麥翹H匱[XF64蘐,褱薓0隕)`#�5Y僠�;寒%�1馯儋�m;麣昍>QD⑧嵷D靋p�U�'��&LE�/p彟璵︓鉁%]枢�8fi劤r玈4蟙7y\萡轏鈦n暡逦瘖I�R��3U魚7+侖€赘#澂m�q˙iD€屏��笅卛*窵6�9�m蝁&困鰅�咠HE倫=(K&鶱!V霄.K抏凩D暷暕{D �釜鱲E軎歞e类N茻麨e�(訫N9邷R旖6吻&3(逯a有漩/DU韟�<遻藠鑹Y浾瘸槙秱V桍�)�9穁[辨4^n媛��5喠�!J峋�?�Q�3鹐Bo–��羾M�Ⅹ抦<�.恦p崜戳Y觙瓝禯綴_p�=al-資鼄Nc蜋宋膳�4vfa侵vl々脸'S喥鵄�8苵�*u猓{噼-高�0%M0�7%仭��<€浞鸵嵖��PK! 褠煻'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels剰M �0匃倃oo雍�&輬协�勪5 6?$Q祉 �,.嘺緳i粭澤c2�1h�:闀q毩m胳嶡RN壻;d癭値o7�g慘(M&$R(.1榬'J摐袏T鶂�8V�"＆A然蠬鱱}狇�|�$絙{�朠�除8塯/]As賲(⑵锑#洩L蔥汉倪��PK-!倞��[Content_Types].xmlPK-!ブх�6+_rels/.relsPK-!ky��theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!柕�P�theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! 褠煻'� theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]� ,� �� $$$'% /�V�#-�1h>臚US頧筣騝昺��j�锂m�,�bdeglnprtvxz}��tB^�>�-�/�4o=萇kX\c]'^d穚 ��幆{��,�cfhijkmoqsuwy{|~€��,�X�� '!�!�晙�8�@��€€€�饞��0�( � �養 �S�� ?�\f�� @@0Q1Q鸙WtW{WZZ糧縕黐\b)bUd_dXl`l黱o靫鰔AzKz| |€€��P�Z�4�:�m�s�r�x�噵崑晫煂瓙覕軘:�D�鯓麡讬鈾隀驒$�,�?�F�S�X�c�m�� *�-�el��! ( S Z € � � � � � ' � � PW��=NBO�#�#�(�(�)�)**�,�,c-k-m-�-K7W7�=�=〧OLUL礚篖釲鏛*P/P4P9PoPtP琍盤隤餚0Q5Q鞷騌UUpVwV籝耏產of€fmg~g俬揾EwNw#|*|&),�8�6�H�� à�,�＆��V�[�N�Z��<�E�� *�-�333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333Z]2&3&�=�=@@铣映沓� �-�8�V�V�@�F�埖埖暗驳��苟蓝投叶舛涠锒蠖 � �:�I�r�r�狗痉糠糠娣�$�h�� *�-�Z]2&3&�=�=@@铣映沓� �-�8�V�V�@�F�埖埖暗驳��苟蓝投叶舛涠锒蠖 � �:�I�r�r�狗痉糠糠娣�$�h�煿-��]婊FR��X�啒6 ��<�dG攋��*�9碕��'Da$\鏣��V�'0]:C��虵...t樕�� u�9淍K骉衠褆�FuuY �"9%M卪t擹wH$b*f/0M ��$hR~ "8p鷝琿]€P萫BW穔�09馟輒篋 xo K!!?5!韐!v"m"#a8#�8#〢#匞#RU#-y#袲$;S$jj$%� %{J%闛%%鮭%痻%�&�,&~4&#'砛'謜'�'頫(P|(})5))�*/*絗*�+�+$,+隩+qU+iy+�',PL,?YN?\?芻?,~?6@躄@�,A鸆AAMA BjuB~zBdC%fC/lC� DHD8VD)gD�Eo EYFOF9F�3FOHF]fGgG�IIP5I�J*J0J�*K�&LLL)_Lw{L�)M� N�OO阹O P2PE&Q�:Q盿QH&R'ReMRqMRZmR�SaJS歕S� T�9T+=TKVT�U�U�UhU|YUUV2V辷VGWC=W醕X�#Y誎Y#QY蘲Y Z�1Z*wZ眤Z�-[�\�,\籗\騗\薾\媩\"]*I]赺]砮]�(^v_嘆_GZ`@alalza�bNbIHb膁b攆b杘bPgc*bd環d3jd�,e�6e癋e沄f gjjc}j�k-;k!Dk嘽kHlf:l嶶lMmlO*m砠m靬m`n搆n�$ohDo軵o;Vo2ro*Sp1ep�q/Kq漋qqrprzrG?r�s,s=t�t�"tt'tTBt揌tbt� uU$u�vveuvQ w�w�w"Jw0]wGx�ye>yrz�z嘕z輔zC {;A{3M{+[{鋍{�3|鏔||,}i`} ~�~*:~!=~l|~��'Y"��7��;�]G�=�g�芕��*:�AG�锽�極�w^���-,�凙�=Q�No��5��9�鱆�+]�lH�醏�鏺�&s��+�*i�泘� 3�9;�骻�� wM�謈�*g��胿�Y|�p5�媔�趈�豯�U{�|��%2�c�` ��(�傿� �Q)�DO�6d���:�^ ��N�6\�i��w%�@B�au�A�婾�抪�舧�}x�鮩�6�痜��U��"�隥��&�{�� m�I��d��9�cB�H�c����;�烲�衐��T�c�詔�.�錓�區�b&�TE�騶�D}�Is��1N�Vd��>�q+�禠�緆�7{�e&�mg�J�-x�p}�"�=)�C�禞�沕�唅�璳�瑉��O��58�鯟�� r��I��/�f�P�桱�闢�� i%��4��,�V<��>�N(��O�^d�� X�駌��*�}9�丗�腍�sd�,�廱�5n��(��酨��$�:Q��(�漿�T�+*�,�pl��J"�褼�lH�l�)n��x'�jI��80�aa��#�54�Fe�絨�z��[0��3�FM�醨��3"�*��#�`5�踂�qh�鑢�{�� O.�k/��6�H?�@C�p�觟�Z��7#�?(��7�狣�,O�� 2�ヾ�� A��塖�Z�h�齳��V&��<�滰�CC�aQ�W�#�[�a�Vi�~�X6�w?�釽�A�苮�6 �腳�俻�[t�{.�L�]R�貆��j��1��7�q)�@F�PN��Aj�vr�&��&��筯�P=�鶹�q�� i\�齝�J�<:�╥�籿��)��Es�,�@�:I��6K�峔��#�袬�悀�P��2��#�驞�q�蛌��*�4@�]J�翽�酕�遠�.y�橳�� 4��7�塊�赩�Fa�nz��$�kf�蛍�]4�鯜�DM�鉯��!�)��<�EB�漑��.��.�蒐�l�飉�Uw��<8��8��;�Tb�縡��鯽�)d�琸��i.�57�Jj�粃��4�]\�璶�#�=��1�IN�T�苚�:�_c�O��g(�嘚�躊�圱�W�朳�r��.��:�1 �誱�峺��)��@€@@@�@@,�H@��Unknown�� G��* €�Times New Roman5�€Symbol3.��* €�Arial71� Courier5.��*a€�Tahoma7.�� Verdana7.��爗 @�Calibri?=� �* €�Courier New;�€WingdingsA��犽 B�Cambria Math"1�鹦�h4蚰fF鹤咶鹤�6��C�_Q�C�_Q��8��亖4dЧЧ�2僸��HP �?��@Z2! xx��WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette HammAnnette HammL �鄥燆鵒h珣+'迟0�� ,8 Xdp |��WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette HammNormal.dotmAnnette Hamm54Microsoft Office Word@n�@杂礊�@@琝瑟�@杂礊��C��胀諟.摋+,D胀諟.摋+,`hp�� 91仓库Q_ЧWESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYTitle� 8@_PID_HLINKS�A`s9http://www.wiu.edu/G !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<�=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~€��Root Entry�� Fp愪虨��€Data ��1Table��fWordDocument��7SummaryInformation(��DocumentSummaryInformation8��CompObj��y�� F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8�9瞦